Masters Plan for Augusta National
By Geoff Shackelford
Architect Mike DeVries grew up at MacKenzie’s Crystal Downs in Michigan and recently oversaw a restoration of the Good Doctor’s Meadow Club, north of San Francisco. While he’s not a fan of the recent tree planting, he feels there may be a more clever way to add challenge for Masters play without penalizing members.
“Instead of planting large groves of trees to dictate play, return to planting a small cluster of three to five trees or even specimens that could turn into the next Eisenhower Tree and which would reward or punish play,” he says. “I would mow tight turf around these areas to encourage aggressive play that challenges a tree. By getting around it, the player will gain a significant advantage. The risk/reward shot will return, instead of just punishing a misplayed shot.”
As for added length, few of the architects feel it is a top priority, except for possibly updating the members’ tees or proposing the addition of another set of tees to deal with the huge, undesirable gap between the back (7,445 yards) and member tees (6,230).
But that decision may have already been made. According to several published reports, the club has been actively scooping up real estate west of the course, with an eye toward more tee expansion on holes like the 455-yard 5th, which has become a drive and short iron in recent years.
MacKenzie bunkering:
The architects polled were unanimous in their desire to maintain the ingenious placement of key hazards, while hoping that the committee would open up the club’s photo archives to facilitate a restoration of MacKenzie’s bunkering.
“To an Australian used to the wonderful ‘MacKenzie’ bunkers of the Melbourne Sandbelt, it is an oddity to see bunkers on a MacKenzie course so pristine, white and rounded off,” says Clayton. “The originals had more of a rustic, rugged and natural feel and one wonders what the course would look like if they were restored to the look and feel of MacKenzie hazards. The world over, his bunkers are subtly different, the result of different soils and the skills of the varying construction crews he used. But those at Augusta look nothing like the work of a Scot who was one of the first to extol the virtues of natural-looking hazards that appeared to be as much the work of nature as man.”
David Esler, whose rugged bunkering at the highly regarded Black Sheep Golf Club outside Chicago has earned rave reviews, concurs. “When one examines early photos, the serpentine bunkers of accidental character define hole strategy at MacKenzie’s Augusta,” he says. “MacKenzie’s bunkers seemed to be ripped from the earth or constructed as if they had bled from a seam in the soil and eroded down hill, exposing sand as they washed away the topsoil. The original bunkers backing the 13th green are exemplary examples of the latter.”
The greens: more quirks:
Both DeVries and Esler point to restoring key hole locations to provide interest and challenge for both member and tournament play. “Like many Golden Age designs, Augusta National has lost much of its original green surface area,” says Esler, who has consulted at classics like Glen View and Chicago Golf Club. “Not so much by neglect as is typical, but via conscious reconstruction. Gone are MacKenzie’s eccentric wings and tabs and false fronts.”
Esler notes that any meeting with club officials must include discussion of restoring the front-left hole location on the par-3 12th and a wily front-right spot on the par-5 15th to “reclaim MacKenzie’s delightful creation.”
DeVries agrees. “Today’s longer hitting pros have altered the strategy at Augusta to one where the players hit it as far as possible and then depend on their wedges instead of angles of play to get close to the pin. The greens are still dictating play with their severity, but the best golfers are emphasizing power over placement so they can use their shorter clubs for approaches.
“By returning some of the more irregularly shaped greens of the original design, say the original bunkerless, L-shaped 7th or the boomerang 9th to their eccentric shapes, it would require more accuracy with a wedge by the pros and will be fun for the members by reintroducing angles of play for them on their longer approaches to tighter, more remote flagstick locations.”
Past vs. future:
Ironically, it seems that for our architects, the future of Augusta National lies in the past. At the same time, they do realize that balancing the challenges of today’s game with the intentions of MacKenzie and Jones may require extreme measures.
“Preserving the most celebrated aspects of the course’s design for Masters competitors, namely no rough and multiple angles of play,” says Weed, “would require the back tees to be at least 8,250 yards and the fairways stripped, drained, SubAired and sand capped to ensure the ball runs out in all conditions.”
Be careful what you suggest. That’s just what may happen.
Related Links:
Latest Comment
- Shag Bag: Who would you pair with Woods?
- Woods selects the Masters for return to golf
- Mell: Woods' story the biggest ever in golf
- Woods already the favorite to win Masters
- Punch Shots: Can Woods win the Masters?
- CA decides not to renew at Doral for WGC
- Complete coverage of the Tiger Woods saga
- A sideshow like no other at the Masters
- Power Rankings: Els on the rise; New No. 1
- Fantasy Island: Transitions Championship
- Els continues to bring awareness to autism
- Golf Guy | Backspin | Quotes | Fantasy Picks
